Genius Hour and 20% Time are unique approaches to both the work and school environments. After reviewing the course content and also reading the article “The 10 Most Asked Questions about Genius Hour and 20% Time Projects,” I determined several key benefits. First, Genius Hour and 20% Time connect to foundational Standards of Mathematical Practice that all mathematics teachers should strive to include. These standards are MP3, constructing arguments and critiquing reasoning, and MP4, modeling with mathematics. While many mathematics teachers are focused on their content area standards for standardized testing, it is essential that they encourage the Standards of Mathematical Practice in order to help students build key skills. By implementing Genius Hour or 20% Time projects, teachers can guarantee their students are experiencing the important skills.
Secondly, Genius Hour and 20% Time encourage independence among students. As described in the articles, through these approaches, students are able to create their own learning paths. This attribute can be helpful in my classes that are standardized-test focused. Often, students complain that they feel like the only focus of the class is for the Algebra I Keystone Exam. This is true of most of their Keystone assessed classes since such an emphasis is placed on these exams. Genius Hour and 20% Time can be a way to bridge the content with their own independent learning opportunities so they have more freedom.
Lastly, Genius Hour and 20% Time are excellent models for 21st Century skills students may need in future jobs and careers. From brainstorming to designing, presenting to receiving feedback, and finally to the revision phase, students are practicing the very steps they may need one day in the work environment.
Even though Genius Hour and 20% Time bring many benefits into the classroom, there are also several hurdles and challenges. First, teachers may question the best ways to grade work completed through the projects. At the end of the day, most teachers, like myself, have a numerical gradebook and are accountable to administrators, parents, and students for the numbers entered in to the gradebook. As suggested in the article, rubrics are a great method for grading work done through the Genius Hour and 20% Time process. Furthermore, the teacher should take the time to establish a process with students, outlining expectations, so students know what they should accomplish as they work through the project. It is the process that matters with these types of activities. Keeping students informed of the grading process from the very early stages will help them achieve. Secondly, another struggle teachers may face is in gaining the support of families (and also administrators). Teachers implementing Genius Hour or 20% Time may be challenged by families that either (1) think their students should focus only on the course content and not “waste time” on other endeavors or (2) question the teacher as to whether they are providing lesson plans and a structured class environment. Some solutions to this hurdle would be for teachers to send home a letter or correspondence about the classroom approach and also keep families fully informed each step of the way. This can be done through newsletters, an online website, sharing student work, or inviting parents into the class at appropriate times. Hopefully, once parents view the positive learning environment and the development of their students’ skills, they will be supportive of the project.